Monday, July 13, 2009

SOLE Dean Karnazes Footbed Review

Sole footbeds[In the this post, iRunFar reader Alan Jaques reviews the SOLE Dean Karnazes edition custom footbed as a follow up to last month's review of three footbeds. - Bryon Powell]

Having been a user of Powerstep footbeds for several years and most recently the Powerstep Pinnacle line, I was excited to get an opportunity to test drive SOLE’s Dean Karnazes signature edition footbeds ($49.95) this past winter/spring especially. Overall, I have been quite pleased with the footbeds. Like some of the other iRF footbed reviewers, I have long suffered from bouts of shin splints due to low arches. As a result, I had resorted to using inserts and only looking covetously at all the cool neutral shoe offerings that my feet couldn’t tolerate.

SOLE Dean Karnazes custom footbedThese are heat moldable inserts, so I initially followed the recommendations and put them in the oven for the appropriate amount of time. One thing I did appreciate out of the box was that in addition to the directions for heating there is also a small heat sensitive sticker on the insert that lets you know when they are “ready”. I was glad for this, because I had long suspected my oven does not heat to temp, so I wound up having to leave my soles in twice as long as recommended for the sticker to turn the appropriate color. Afterward, I followed the directions, put the inserts in my trail shoes and stood straight up for a couple of minutes.

I then paired my new footbeds with some recently purchased Lafuma Sky Race shoes. After a brief initial run with the shoes and insoles I completed a five hour training run on my local trails. My initial impression was how little I thought about the inserts, which I viewed as a good sign they were working. The footbeds did seem to have just the right amount of cushioning versus support to be very comfortable.

Since that initial run I’ve probably logged several hundred miles and ran a 50k, 60k and a 50 miler on them. Having had them almost six months now two features really stand out as making these footbeds excel over others I’ve used.

First is the pronounced heel cup. While not as noticeable (to me) on the road, I certainly have a sense that paired with a trail shoe the deep heel cup helps keep my foot in place on nasty sloppy terrain (i.e. McNaughton this year), as well as potentially keeping blisters at bay.

The second is that the SOLE’s have noticeably less volume than other insoles I’ve used while maintaining the same level of comfort. As a runner with a higher volume foot I feel this is a plus, especially in ultras where your feet tend to swell later in the race. When soaking wet, the insoles also don’t seem to absorb water like other inserts and don’t have that squishy feel even after multiple stream crossings.

Overall, I would certainly recommend these footbeds to runners in need of support and especially trail runners. After using these products, I would certainly consider trying out some of the other products in SOLE’s line. While the cost still seems a bit high to me at fifty bucks, my inserts appear to be holding up very well after six months and have no signs of deteriorating.

-Alan Jaques

P.S. I accidentally ran a 5k in my “custom” orthotics and got a blister a week after running 50 miles at the Nashville Ultra blister free with the SOLE footbeds. Go figure!

Read more of SOLE Dean Karnazes Footbed Review!

Friday, July 10, 2009

Born to Run Book Review by Elise Braner

Elyses ClosetAs someone who loves running books, I was excited to read Born to Run: A Hidden Tribe, Superathletes, and the Greatest Race the World Has Never Seen. The book, written by Christopher McDougall explores the running culture of the Tarahumara, an Indian tribe in Mexico, known for their amazing endurance and running abilities. The book also touches on the culture and occasional quirkiness of ultrarunning.

When I started reading the book, I was about to be thrown into my first ultrarunning experience, not as a runner, but as an ultra- coach. I read with extra enthusiasm to really understand and hopefully absorb some of the culture. I wasn’t disappointed. McDougall introduces the reader to well-known ultrarunners, brings them into the culture of an ultramarathon race situation, as well as to an understanding of the passion needed to be successful in the undertaking of one of these life altering races.

McDougall infuses the book with many interesting notes and timely topics that appeal to runners across the board. For example, he argues that the sport of distance running becomes more popular during hard economic times because people are literally running away from their problems. He also talks about the business of running and the sometimes negative effects that the shoe companies can have on the sport.

Personally, one of the most interesting aspects of this book was the focus on barefoot running. Truthfully, reading it made me want to get out there and try the Nike Free or hop on the field for some barefoot striders, something I haven’t done since college. After chatting with my coach, who told me that the “running shoe is a wonderful invention.” I decided against it.

On the first day of my ultra-practice, I noticed that one of my athletes had the Vibram FiveFinger shoes on for practice, which offer no support, and are just one small step up from barefoot running. Our practices typically go through technically challenging trails, with a lot of rocks and rough terrain. Unfortunately, he ended up with a third metatarsal stress fracture, and has decided to go back to his normal training shoes upon his return to running.

As much as I enjoy reading running books, I often wonder how much of an effect they have on the culture of the sport, much like a shoe company such as Vibram or Nike. Reading a book like this, makes me want to sign-up and train for an ultra tomorrow, or even think about training in shoes that may not be appropriate for my training. Like the book states, these ultramarathons have exploded out of obscurity, but I wonder how much of that is being driven by books and even some smaller, niche publications.

Overall, I think this was an enjoyable read that was easy to follow, and will appeal to everyone from the casual runner to the competitive ultrarunner. If anything, this will be a book that will be discussed in the running community for awhile. Not only have most of my trail running athletes read it, but I have heard it being discussed on the past few long runs at my road running club.

Trail Goat's Discussion Questions
  • If you've read the book:
    • What's your overall impression?
    • Who were your favorite characters?
    • Did you agree with McDougall's premise that less is more in the running shoe category?
    • Do you think the book is dangerous to individuals? To the sport of ultrarunning?
  • If you haven't read the book, do you plan to do so?

Read more of Born to Run Book Review by Elise Braner!

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Hardrock 100 Prediction Contest

Hardrock 100 HRHDue to popular demand, iRunFar is bringing you another prediction contest - this time for the gnarly Hardrock 100 (HRH). This contest will be the simple-yet-challenging Hardrock yin to Western States's ultra-complicated yang. All you do is pick the five individuals who you think will be the first five to kiss the hardrock in Silverton. There are no gender distinctions or geriatric divisions. Hardrock does not play favorites and neither will we.

The Winners
This go around there are no prizes, just pride. In the end, we'll recognize two winners.

The first winner will be the individual with the deepest exacta. He or she will make the most correct picks spot-for-spot from the top down. A single missed pick will result in the disregard of all subsequent correct picks.

The second winner will be the low scorer in the same style as the Western States prediction contest. That is, points are accumulated on the difference between an athlete's predicted place and his or her actual place. DNSs and DNFs will be scored based on the athlete finishing one spot below the final finisher. An entrant's four lowest scoring picks will count. (Yes, this is a tougher standard than the WSER contest, but so is HRM itself.)

Ties in either contests will be broken by determining which entrant's predicted winning time was closest to the actual winning time.

The Contest
Make your picks for the top five places below. Given that runners may still get in off the waitlist, we've included the top 50 off the July 2 version of the waitlist. You are free to pick waitlist runners, but you do so at your own risk. The contest closes at 4 a.m. MDT on Friday, July 10... we want there to be some mystery as to who gets in off the waitlist from the Silverton gymnasium.


[Thanks again to Mitchell Goodman of Ultra Good for being the man that makes this iRunFar prediction contests possible!]

Comments
Feel free to post your picks or even some Hardrock shout outs in the comments.

Read more of Hardrock 100 Prediction Contest!

This Week In Running (Week of 7/11 & 7/12)

Hardrock 100Friday, July 10.....6:00 AM.....Siverton, Colorado.....A 100 mile counter-clockwise loop through the back country of the San Juan Mountains.....The old mining towns of Silverton, Lake City, Ouray, Telluride and Ophir.....Approximately 33,000 feet of total elevation gain.....It is one of the toughest 100-milers around, and it is the Hardrock 100 Mile Endurance Run. In the 2008 edition of Hardrock, Kyle Skaggs became the first runner to finish the event in under 24 hours (23:23), winning by nearly 6 and a half hours. Diana Finkel was the first female finisher (6th overall) in 31:09. 70 percent of the 141 starters (98) would finish this grueling event. Make no mistake about it, this is one tough event. The finishing rate is mind-numbingly low (typically in the 50 and 60 percents). In fact, in its history, 1,538 runners have toed the starting line at Hardrock, and a mere 879 have managed to cross the finish line - 57.1 percent.

Little Giant Saddle Hardrock 100 HRHThe trail marking crew near the top of near the top of Little Giant Saddle

The Hardrock course is designed to "bring the runners into the four major mining centers of the San Juan Mountains (Silverton, Lake City, Ouray, and Telluride) while staying as much as possible on trails and abandoned roads originally created by the miners to give the participant the maximum feeling of wilderness" and offers a "graduate level challenge for endurance runs". This is a dangerous course. Runners must contend with not only altitude, steepness, and remoteness, but also with mild rock climbing (hands required), wading through ice cold streams, struggles through snow (which may be rock hard and slick, or so soft that you sink to your knees and above), cliff crossings where a fall could result in a 300 foot plunge, and the use of fixed ropes as handrails.

Oscars Pass Bruce Grant Hardrock 100 HRHBruce Grant still running near the top of Oscar's Pass

Weather has always been a key factor at Hardrock, and can be as formidable as the terrain, remoteness and high altitude. It is the race director's "general opinion that the first fatality we may have will be either from hypothermia or lightning." Runners should be prepared for snow, ice, and even a monsoon. You just have to love a race that puts this in its runner's manual :
"The Colorado Mountain Club advises climbers in the Colorado mountains to be off the peaks by noon. Since this may not fit in with your position on the course, you must use extreme caution. Always remember that the time limit is 48 hours. The long time limit is not only a recognition of the difficult terrain, but also allows runners to wait out thunderstorms or other life-threatening weather. You can hunker down in a valley for 2-4 hours and still finish; but, if you get fried by lightning your running career may end on the spot. Discretion is the better part of valor. Take comfort in the fact that these thunderstorms are widespread. If you are pinned down, chances are that other runners are too. Use the time wisely - eat, drink, stay warm, and rest."
Joe Clapper Bruce Grant Oscars Pass Grant Swamp Pass Hardrock 100 HRHJoe Clapper and Bruce Grant atop Oscar's Pass looking at Grant Swamp Pass

Badwater Ultramarathon 135Another extremely challenging race is taking place this weekend (Monday, July 13), the Badwater 135-Mile Ultramarathon, a 135 mile foot race from Badwater Basin in Death Valley to the portals of Mount Whitney, with temperatures that can reach into the 120s. Called "the most demanding and extreme running race offered anywhere on the planet" and "the toughest footrace on Earth", Badwater starts adjacent to a pool of saltwater located in Badwater, which marks the lowest elevation in North America at 280 feet below sea level, and finishes at Mount Whitney Portal at an elevation of about 8,360 feet. The course covers three mountain ranges and over 13,000 feet of vertical ascent. There are 69 "flat" miles, 46 "uphill" miles, and 20 "downhill" miles. Competitors travel through places or landmarks with names like Mushroom Rock, Furnace Creek, Salt Creek, Devil’s Cornfield, Devil’s Golf Course, Stovepipe Wells, Keeler and Lone Pine. In 2008, Jorge Pacheco (23:20:16) was the overall winner, and Jamie Donaldson (26:51:33) set a new women's course record in taking third place overall. The course record is held by Valmir Nunes (2007), in an astonishing 22:51:29 !

[Trail Goat Note: Although TWIR's Tony Portera is too humble to say anything, he's been training his butt off and will be racing Badwater early next week. Good luck, Tony!]

There are several other ultra events taking place this weekend, including the following (which is just a small sampling of your ultra options) :

Devil's Backbone 50 Mile (July 11 in Bozeman, Montana) - This is called a "graduate level run" (yes, like Hardrock). It is almost entirely unsupported and unmarked, and is not recommended as a first 50-miler. There are many cairns and you primarily stay on the ridge but with no ribbon it is still possible to get well off course. The "graduate" part is due to the requirement to carry what you need for 5 - 9 hours of running and once out on the course there is no easy way out until the turnaround. Runners are almost always above 9,500 feet on a rocky (but beautiful) trail. The course starts and finishes at the Hyalite Creek Trailhead and is an out-and-back on 100% trails with one significant climb to 10,300 feet, and multiple short steep climbs totaling 11,400 feet. Though the climb is not huge, it is deceptively hard due to elevation and sometimes rocky trails. The course is not be marked except by Forest Service blazes and cairns . It is generally well-worn except in meadows. There are streams multiple times in the first (and last) 7 miles, a murky lake at 11 miles (and 39 miles), and a very small spring a quarter mile later, and lots of snow to put in your water bottle - but bring a filter. The cutoff is 9 hours at the turn-around cabin. Exposure is extreme in case of a thunderstorm. Possibility of elk, goats, mountain lions and bears (all seen in past few years).

Dances with Dirt - Devlils Lake 50 Mile and 50K Ultras (July 11 in Baraboo, Wisconsin) - "Weak, wimpy, treadmill running pansies who are afraid to get some dirt in their shorts need not apply.....expect to be scratched, muddied and bruised.....expect a day that leaves you knowing you are fully alive, awake and crankin' on all cylinders.....expect insanity, stupidity and nirvana."

Rattlesnake Trail 50k (July 11 in Charleston, WV) - This one-loop course features 5,000 feet of climbing (10 climbs) and is run on 80% trail, 15% dirt road, and 5% asphalt. The trails are rocky and typically (unless it rains) dry. Runners can expect sticks, bugs, snakes, deer, bear and Big Foot.

That will do it for this week. Stop by next Wednesday for a look at a few of the events on tap for the weekend of July 18 and 19, including the Vermont 100 Mile Endurance Run.

Read more of This Week In Running (Week of 7/11 & 7/12)!

Monday, July 6, 2009

Kevin Sullivan, 5th Place 2009 Western States 100, Interview

Inov-8iRunFar was lucky enough to catch up with New Englander Kevin Sullivan following his fifth place finish at the 2009 Western States 100. For those of you who don't know Kevin, iRunFar readers voted his second place at last year's Vermont 100 as the best debut 100 miler of 2008. Already in 2009, Kevin has won the Rocky Raccoon 50 mile and Coyote Two Moon 100k and placed second at the Leona Divide 50 mile. Read on for a look into Kevin's burgeoning ultrarunning career and his successful debut on the Western States Trail.

iRunFar.com (iRF): Today we're speaking with Inov-8 runner Kevin Sullivan fresh off his fifth place finish at the Western States Endurance Run. Kevin, first we have to congratulate you on your outstanding performance at this year's Western States 100. As you are relatively unknown and your top placing surprised many folks in the ultrarunning community, we'd like to hear some about your athletic background. It's our understanding that you were a competitive triathlete before you got in to ultrarunning. What is your prior athletic history and how did you get into trail and ultra running?

Kevin Sullivan (KS): Bryon, first, thanks for the opportunity to speak to iRunFar. As you know, your website is a top notch source of information and analysis and you have an incredible following in the ultra community. It has been great resource for me as I am still new to the sport. Nice work.

As to my background. I'll try to keep this short. I was a fat kid and smoker until 1996. In 1996, I started running to try to get ready for my career as a law firm lawyer. I ran my first marathon in 1998 (while still smoking - but I quit during my taper). I went on to run a bunch of marathons and road races etc. In 2000, I got into triathlon when I started cross training as a result of some running injuries. I did Ironman Wisconsin in 2002 and a couple other tris, but I wouldn't call myself a competitive triathlete. In fact, although I liked the long stuff, conceptually, I am not a big fan of swimming or cycling. I love running and I loved long stuff, so that's when I started thinking that maybe some day I'd do ultras. I first wanted to focus on my marathon PR, but soon after that I saw a posting for a night run organized by our local ultra club (the infamous G.A.C.) and figured I'd give it a try. It started at 10 p.m. on a torrential stormy spring night. I was totally unprepared and ran for 6 hours and fell about 25 times (I'm not kidding). I chatted with folks, some of whom were doing Western States (WS or WSER) that year, and just thoroughly enjoyed the whole experience. That's when I decided ultras were my thing and I started signing up for races.

iRF: How did you prepare for this year's Western States? How was your season leading up to the race?

K.S.: WSER was my focus race for 2009, so my training was pretty WSER specific with focus on building base and speed early in the winter, then hills and strength in the spring. Unfortunately, I missed most of the downhill portion of my training due to an injury after Leona Divide. That's what probably what led to my iliotibial band (IT band) issues at WS. My lead up to WS, though, was pretty good. I raced Rocky Raccoon 50M early in the season with an effortless 6:05 finish and then ran Coyote Two Moon 100k (C2M) to get in some early season hills. Leona Divide 50M was another key training race for me to get back onto the hills and some heat. I didn't want to push too hard there, but I developed a bad case of anterior tibialis tendonitis which took me out of Miwok (probably not a bad thing given that weather there).

In the last 2 months, I really focused on strength, nutrition and heat. All of these paid off big on race day as I had no nutrition/stomach issues during the race and although it was damn hot, the heat never affected my racing. My nutrition plan was absolutely top notch and felt fully fueled the whole way. I've not only focused on race nutrition, but with the help of a nutritionist I've revamped my entire diet and it has had a significant impact on my overall training.

iRF: You're a husband, a father, and a partner at a large law firm. How do reach a balance between your family, a demanding profession, and training?

Kevin Sullivan Robinson Flat WS100 2009K.S.: It's not easy, but just like anyone else it is a matter of juggling priorities. Family and running are top priorities. Work pays the bills, so I can't let that fall too far down either. The first sacrifice is sleep. Not ideal, but at least it doesn't involve disappointing any people. The price is recovery, so I try to make that up elsewhere (hydration, nutrition, massage, yoga, ice baths etc.). I also have the most understanding wife and family. That helps. My wife Jeannie has helped juggle our schedules so that I still bear my fair share of the load, but the timing may be different. I try to incorporate the kids into some of my activities, i.e. cool down runs, stretching, weights (my son Jake usually works out with me), etc.

Given that I'm a partner at my law firm and almost all my clients know that running is a priority for me, I have some latitude/flexibility in my schedule. I wake up super early and have conference calls with some of my clients as early as 5:30 a.m. I get my runs done in the a.m. and get to the office a little later, after spending time with my kids. I have breakfast with them and bring my daughter to school. And, I take advantage of the days when I'm not busy to see the kids more or get in another workout if I am lucky. I have a great relationship with my kids and, believe it or not, see them more than many guys who work less than I do. The bottom line, though, is that I don't have as much time as most other guys to train. There are lots of other training workouts I'd like to be doing, but I just don't have that type of schedule/life. Maybe some day.

iRF: It appears that your wife is also a student of the sport... or at least she had the best picks for the men's field in the iRunFar WS Prediction Contest. Where did she learn about all these runners? More importantly, can you forgive her for underestimating you? She picked you to finish 8th.

K.S.: Jeannie is my Johan Bruyneel. She is extremely supportive of my running and has crewed at the 2008 Vermont 100 (VT 100) and WSER. She is super organized and knows how to prepare for the races. And, as you know she is a regular reader of iRF. I'm sure she learned most of what she knows about who's who from your blog. Honestly, she knew more about the other guys than me. I really don't talk much about running around her - just updates on my training, racing - enough so she knows where I am when, etc.

As for her pick for me, all I can say is that she's always underestimating what I can do - from the day I popped the question. I like to keep her on her toes. Besides, she was probably the only one who picked me to place in the top 8 anyway . . . .

iRF: Ok, onto this year's Western States! You gradually moved from 17th at mile 10 to 5th at mile 55 and then powered into 2nd by mile 90 before holding onto 5th. Was your race plan to go out conservatively and move up? Did you stick to your race plan?

This is the $64 million question, no? Yes, my plan was to be conservative. My primary goal - beyond getting to Auburn in one piece and hopefully earning a buckle - was to get into the top 10 just so I could come back in 2010 with some experience under my belt (and its buckle). I still saw that as an aggressive goal. After all, this was my first WSER and only my second 100 miler. In my mind I was thinking 10th would be a huge win. As you and I discussed before the race, I read Craig Thornley's blog and was focused on what it would take to grab that 10th spot. I didn't think 18:30 would do it, but who really knew.

In the end, I ran my own race. I'll admit that I run (and train) by heart rate, as I think it is the best way to avoid overdoing it early and paying the price later. I stuck to HR early on and think it worked quite well. I ran within myself the whole way and just moved up spots without any effort. By the time I got to the River (mile 78) I was shocked to be in 5th. My run down to the River was slow. After the River, my pacer forced me to push harder to move up - but really w/o much effort. We ran the flats hard, but it wasn't difficult. I have good leg speed from my marathon days so pushing 7's late in a race feels comfortable. Tsuyoshi, Jasper and Jez all obviously ran strong, as well. Eventually, though, my IT band did me in. It had started to give out back on the descent into Deadwood Canyon when I was running with Eric Grossman and just got worse all day, until I was limping out of Foresthill (mile 62) and barely made it out of Brown's Bar (mile 90) at all.

All in all, while I'm no WSER expert, I believe the course definitely has a strategy of its own and it requires a lot of prep and experience to run it well. I feel much better prepared for next year already. As for this year, given my goals and race plan, and relative inexperience, 5th place was a huge victory and I am thrilled.

iRF: What were your biggest issues during the race? What were your most difficult stretches?

K.S.: I had one major issue at WSER - my IT band. That was enough. It started to flare up on the descent into Deadwood Canyon. I have had nagging IT band issues since finishing VT100 last year. It comes and goes and is not surprisingly aggravated by downhill running (it flared up at C2M as well). I've worked to strengthen the muscles in the hip etc. to help, but this year missed my downhill running training due to other injuries. In any event, I adapted by running after Deadwood to try to compensate. I also start popping Tylenol Rapid Release and ibuprofen. All of that helped manage the pain, but my running was not normal. As you know when I saw you at Michigan Bluff, it was a physical and mental nag, but I wasn't ready to concede.

That said, by Foresthill I was having a ton of trouble actually running out of aid stations. The IT band would lock when I stopped and that was the case from Foresthill to the finish - and worse with each stop. All of my downhill running from there in was granny-like. It made the run to the River a lot slower than planned. The worst stretch was going down the descent after Brown's Bar - my IT band was totally locked and I had to walk the whole thing. If you've read Jasper's RR, you know he saw me walking that descent and it energized him. My bad. The downhill stretch into No Hands was also a disaster because I just could not run it - too much pain - and it allowed Tsuyoshi and Jasper, and then later Jez, all to catch me. I had put in a lot of effort to create a gap and gave it back solely because of the IT band (that's not to say those guys weren't running well, because they were). With a better IT band, I could run hard at that point and feel confident I would have held all of them off - but that's not the way the story was going to be written that day.

iRF: Which parts of the race did you enjoy the most? What will stand out most about your participation in this year's Western States Endurance Run?

K.S.: I enjoyed the whole race, from beginning to end. The experience was amazing. I loved the start. The energy and excitement at the start was truly inspiring. Indescribable, as you know, and the only way to understand it is to be there. The finish was great too, for obvious reasons - just getting done. And to find that many people (still not a lot) at the finish of an ultra is pretty special. Other highlights include Devil's Thumb (yes, I love that climb), Foresthill and the River crossing (so damn refreshing). The run through the neighborhoods after Robie is nice - just quiet and you know you are there. I liked it. My aid station transitions are quick (maybe a holdover from the tri days), and maybe too quick, so I never really had time to see much or fall in love with the energy at any one of them. I will say that the folks at Miller's Defeat were awesome though.

iRF: What shoes, gear, and nutrition products did you rely on during the race?

I ran the entire race in a single pair of Inov-8 Roclite 305's and a pair of Drymax Hot Weather Socks - both are sponsors. Both companies make a phenomenal range of products that are truly suited to what we did and I am fortunate to have their support - before, during and after the race. As you know, I also wore the Rudy Project Noyz sunglasses with ImpaxtC Photochromic clear lenses. They are outstanding sunglasses and ideal for the alternating sunny/shaded conditions at WSER. The Noyz are extremely light and durable and I've worn that at a number of races.

As for my nutrition, that's confidential, but the one thing I'll say is that it is essentially all liquids. It was perfect for the race conditions this year and I was well fueled, without issues, all day. I supplement with Clif Shot Bloks - great product - and a few other random things.

iRF: Is there anything that you'd change about your preparation for or racing during this year's race?

Kevin Sullivan Michigan Bluff WS100 2009K.S.: Honestly, not much. My downfall was lack of strength on downhill training, but that was really because of the time off in April. I just need to stay healthy to get all my training in. To that end, I need to focus a little more on pacing my training so that I do not get injured, I suppose. Also, I did not dial in to my non-race nutrition until the last 6 weeks (when I lost 5 lbs). With my new diet in place, I think I will have a lot better recovery and results from training. And, no, I'm not going vegan - I love ice cream and burgers (ok, and fries too) way too much!

iRF: Do you think your and Leigh Schmitt's performances establish that East Coast racers can run Western States well? Did you two work together at all during the race?

K.S.: I think both Leigh and I had good days at WSER, but neither of us had the day we should have/could have. Maybe that can be said for a lot of folks. (Keep in mind that Leigh did no West Coast training for the race and still managed the terrain well - that's impressive.) We started together, but Leigh went out hard and I did not see him again until the climb to Green Gate.

As for the East Coasters running West Coast races (not just WSER), I just don't see why it's even a debate. First, given how small the ultra community is, I just view it as one community - this isn't the Civil War era (and what about the folks in the middle of the country??). That said, I think West Coasters have a significant advantage with year round training weather, more races, bigger ultra community, etc., but it's not like there are different running genetics on the coasts. If our performances at WSER help people recognize that there are talented folks running ultras on the East Coast, that's great, but Leigh and I are not the only ones. Guys like Mark Lundblad, Sean Andrish, Todd Walker, Mike Wardian, Eric Grossman, Glen Redpath and many others, including old coots like Joe Kulak and Mike Morton, can run and have run some pretty incredible races. On the women's side, Anne Lundblad and Aliza LaPierre (although a little less well known) have legs too.

The issue, I guess, is that unless we race on the West Coast we just don't get recognized. Personally, I'd like to see a better mix of East and West Coasters at races on both coasts. It is a bit of a bummer to run an East Coast race and run well, only to then realize no one cares and it might not even get covered in UltraRunning Magazine. In the end, though, my running is for me. I will say, though, that running WSER does require some pretty specific focus - it's not that East Coasters don't have the ability, but we don't have the same resources - i.e., long hills, money to travel, heat to train in, etc. It would be interesting to see West Coasters try to run some of our winter races - hopefully, Montrail is willing to incorporate something into the Cup series. It is rare to see anyone from the West Coast run any of the Vermont races.

iRF: Leigh's been pretty unbeatable in East Coast 50s for quite some time. You've now been the top Easterner at Vermont last year and the top Easterner as States this year. That's all the more impressive when you consider that these were your first two 100 milers. Do you think you're on the verge of establishing yourself as the top East Coast 100 mile runner?

K.S.: The simple answer is no. I'm still a newbie in this sport and although I have had a decent amount of success I have yet to really execute anything well - in my mind. Leigh has been doing this a long time and has established himself as a dominant force on the East Coast (c'mon, he holds the VT100 course in 14:53 - that's fast) and extremely competitive nationally. Yes, I think I have the ability to be competitive across both coasts and maybe some day I'll establish myself as one of the top runners, but right now I'm a rookie fumbling through with some lucky successes. My 50 mile times are not reflective of what I can really do, as I've never been prepared or raced well. I'm looking forward to chasing Leigh in a few of those hopefully later this year and in the years to come. We talk a bit and he's a great competitor, but also a super nice guy. But in my mind, guys like Leigh and Mark Lundblad, among others, have established themselves as dominant forces and set the bar pretty darn high for guys like me.

iRF: Is there anything else that we forgot to ask that you'd like to share?

K.S.: I would just like to extend a big thank you to all the folks who have helped me this year. There are a ton of folks in the ultra community I've met over the course of this year who have become friends and have had suggestions, advice or just generally been supportive at races - including guys I run against at the front. As you know, the ultra community is special in many ways including the way we interact with each other - with a lot of mutual respect. From the slowest person to the front runners, ultrarunners share a common bond that really brings us together. In any event, my family, crew, advisors and extended friends in the ultrarunning community have really helped me figure the training/racing thing out so far so I owe them a big thanks.

iRF: Thanks so much for taking the time to share your thoughts and experience with iRunFar's readers! Best of luck in WSER 2010!

Read more of Kevin Sullivan, 5th Place 2009 Western States 100, Interview!

Thursday, July 2, 2009

Western States 100 Prediction Contest Results

Western States Endurance RunWe didn't want a week to go by between the 2009 Western States Endurance Run and the announcement of the winners of the Western States Prediction Content. That meant a combination of good coding by Mitchell Goodman of the Ultra Good blog and some good old fashioned number crunching by Bryon Powell. As Bryon was manually ringing up the numbers (and to save the embarrassment of some contest participants) we're only posting the results of those who accumulated 50 or fewer points. (For a refresher on the rules, check out the contest entry page.) Read on to find out who won the contest, what they win, and who did the best at picking the men's and women's fields separately. [If you notice an error in our arithmetic, please let us know!]

The Winners
MontrailMountain HardwearNo more waiting... except to thank Montrail and Mountain Hardwear for providing the great prizes for the contest. Without them, the only thing to come out of the contest would be bragging rights! On to the winners!
  1. John McAllister (16 points) wins a pair of Montrail Mountain Masochist trail shoes, a Mountain Hardwear’s Refueler short models (men) or a MH Pace(r) short or skort model, and Mountain Hardwear mountain performance shirt.
  2. Evan Cestari (17 points) also wins a pair of Mountain Masochists as well as his choice of a Mountain Hardwear performance bottom noted above.
  3. Andy Holak (20 points and 2 tie break points) wins a pair of Mountain Masochists and a Montrail hat.
Fortunately, Andy's tie-break picks of AJW and Anita Ortiz put him ahead of John Medinger (also 20 points, but with less successful masters picks), lest we have to wrestle with the issue of awarding a prize to a WSER board member. That said, it's pretty cool that Tropical John knows his race so well!

The Overall Contest Field
Below are all 46 individuals who scored 50 or fewer points.

[Trail Goat Note: For the record, I ended up with 53 points - 45 for men and 8 for women with 1 tie-break point.]

Men's Predictions
No one picked the men's field better than Jeannie Sullivan, Kevin Sullivan's (5th place man) wife! Although she picked Jurek and Mackey for first and second, she went on to pick the following men to total a mere 9 points: 3. Koerner (2 pts); 4. Halekas (0 pts), 5. Cooper (14 pts, but not scored as Jeannie had 5 better predictions), 6. Jones-Wilkins (4 pts), 7. Schmitt (0 pts), 8. Sullivan (3 pts). Given the craziness of this year's men's race, we're awfully impressed with Jeanie's picks.

Women's Predictions
The women's race appears to have been much more predictable. So much so that there was a 9-way tie for the best predictions for the women's field. The following picksters all totaled an incredible 4 points: Steve Itano, Mike Chastain, Craig Thronley, Chris Roman, Greg Bomhoff, Evan Cestari, Amanda Stickel, Suzanne Carrier, and Jon Allen. Way to know your ladies!

Final Words
Thanks to the nearly 200 individuals who took part in the contest. We had a lot of fun bringing the contest to you and hope you had a lot of fun participating. We hope to bring you more fun contests in the future.

Read more of Western States 100 Prediction Contest Results!

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

2009 Western States 100 Roundup [Updated 7/3/09]

Western States Endurance RunYeah, I was on the course and could report on what I saw at this year's Western States 100. Not gonna do that as such coverage would be incomplete due to my switch from reporter to Andy Jones-Wilkins's pacer at Bath Road. I'll leave the reporting to those who had a consistent role (be it as a competitor, a photographer, or a videographer) from the start to the finish... or at least the finish of their attempt. We'll be adding some additional sources as we see fit. Congratulations to all the runners, volunteers, crew, board members, and pacers who made the 2009 Western States Endurance Run a race to remember!

Race Reports and the Like
Here are post-Western States dispatches from the some of our favorite bloggers:
Matt Hart's Videos
While we here at iRunFar would prefer to see Matt Hart running in this year's WSER, boy are we glad he showed up to be the race's unofficial videographer. Below are links to Matt's great interviews and shots from the race.
Hart also took a bunch of photos over the WS weekend.

More Photos
If you want photos of a West Coast ultra, the first person to whom you should look is Glenn Tachiyama. WSER '09 was no exception. Here ya go!
Of course, some folks other than Hart and Glenn Tachiyama took some great shots of this year's race.
Conclusion
Please feel free to leave a comment if you know of a good 2009 WS100 race report, photo set, video, article, or other resource.

Hal not following the rules coming into Michigan Bluff! :-)
(click to enlarge)

Read more of 2009 Western States 100 Roundup [Updated 7/3/09]!

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

SOLE and Montrail Running Footbed Reviews

Many of you address any number of running issues by replacing a shoe's standard sockliner with a premium footbed, a/k/a insole. Today, we provide you with iRunFar reader reviews of three heat-moldable footbeds: the SOLE Slim Sport, the Montrail Enduro Sole, and the SOLE Softec Ultra. If you regularly use insoles, we'd love for you to leave a comment explaining why you use insoles, which insoles you use, and how they've worked (or not) for you. Now, on to the reviews...

SOLE Slim Sport Review by Lucia Olivera

Sole footbedsIn my never-ending search for a cure from what appeared to be eternal shin splints, I had tried everything: strengthening exercises, massages, ice, rest, bike, drinking tea made out of cat's hair, selling my soul to the devil... nothing worked. Now, I know enough about science (and common sense) to know that you need more than one observation and you must control all other factors to make the affirmation that a hypothesis is a "fact" or a theory that holds in general. So while I can't tell you that these insoles are going to cure everyone's shin splints, I can tell you that they seem to be helping with mine, because I haven't had pain in my shins since I started wearing them. However, one other factor, a change in my stride, could be also contributing to my shin pain relief. Around the same time I started wearing the SOLE Slim Sport insoles ($39.95), a fellow blogger told me to shorten my stride and avoid excessive heel striking. For this reason, I cannot say it was only the insoles that helped my shin splints go away.

Sole Slim Sport footbedBut, back to the insoles: Around Christmas of 2007 someone gave me a pair of Superfeet, which I used for a few months but quickly realized they didn't feel good. They were too stiff, and they pressed on my heel on places that didn't feel right. The SOLE Slim Sport have a "heat-moldable base". You actually warm up the insoles in the oven for a couple of minutes, you put them inside your shoes, you put your shoes on, and stand still for a couple of minutes. This helps the insole to mold better with the shape of your feet, while giving you support where you need it without pushing in the wrong places. It's important to mention that when you heat the insoles they don't become completely flexible like clay or putty, they hold the main shape that benefits you and adds support, but it molds slightly to the shape of your feet. They feel great! The size I got fit perfectly in my shoes.

In short, I would pick the Sole Slim Sport insole over Superfeet in a snap, and they seem to be a cheap alternative to expensive customized orthotics.

Legal Disclaimer: the author of this review has not ran more than 13.1 miles wearing the reviewed insoles, nor is she a doctor or specialist in anything even remotely related to human health, sports medicine, or physiology.

Montrail Enduro Sole Review
by Robert G.

Montrail Enduro SoleNothing could be simpler with the Montrail Enduro-Sole ($36). Montrail's Enduro-Soles have a PRFRM thermomoldable footbed for a custom fit. First off, heating them up was a neat feature. You bake them at 225 degrees F for two minutes, any longer and you can melt the plastics. After baking, you put them in a pair of shoes and stand with even pressure for an additional two minutes. After molding them, you can enjoy a nice comfortable foot bed to run in or recover with.

Montrail Enduro SoleSo on my test runs with the insoles, mostly in my shoes for snowshoe running, I noticed a very comfortable fit in the shoe and not much additional weight at 1.5 oz (according to Montrail). I thoroughly enjoyed the feel after these runs. After a few snowshoe runs I ventured out on the roads with them. I again enjoyed the feel of the inserts. They are comfortable, flexible, soft, and slightly supportive. I do wonder how they will be after I rack up some miles on them. After molding the footbed, you really compress the areas your foot sits. So I do wonder how long they will last.

I currently use another brand of inserts that I enjoy just as well. These other inserts have helped me tremendously through some aches and pains over the last couple of years. They are firmer than the Montrail Enduro Soles. However, I will definitely use the Montrail Enduro Soles as a recovery insert in my shoes and possibly after more testing rotate them in for more extensive use. The softness is what is called for after a nice long run. Some may like the softness for all of their runs.

SOLE Softec Ultra Review by Bobby Gill

Sole footbedsThe SOLE Softec Ultrafootbeds ($44.95) are constructed with a moldable EVA base, open-cell polyurethane cushioning, and a perforated polyester weave topsheet for moisture wicking. Of the seven available SOLE insoles, the Ultra Softec's are the thickest with 3.2mm of cushioning.

Sole Softec Ultra I tested the Ultra Softecs for two weeks on multiple trail runs ranging from 4 miles to 16 miles. On my first run with them my intial impression was that they were relatively comfortable, but after putting a few miles in my metatarsals started to get noticeably cramped. Thinking this may be due to the switch from Superfeet to SOLEs, I kept wearing them but the cramping never ceased. This produced serious discomfort on my runs that I definitely would not be able to tolerate in an ultra.

I believe the cramping of my metatarsals was due to the increased thickness of the Ultra Softecs compared to my Superfeet. They are approximately three times thicker and I apparently need all the space I can get to keep my dogs from barking. Because of this metatarsal cramping I was unable to get a good feel for how the molded footbed performs supporting the foot. SOLEs are popular insoles, so I imagine I might have better luck with one of the thinner insoles in the SOLE product line such as the Softec Regulars or the Slim Sports.

Overall, I would not recommend the SOLE Softec Ultras to someone who has wide/fat feet and needs space in their shoe, but I wouldn't not recommend them to someone with normal sized feet since it is possible the molded footbed could provide valuable arch support.

For a more extensive review of the SOLE Softec Ultra, including photos comparing the Ultras with other footbeds and sockliners, check out Bobby Gill's blog.

Additional iRunFar Footbed Reviews

Read more of SOLE and Montrail Running Footbed Reviews!

Friday, June 26, 2009

Western States Group-Think Predictions

Western States Endurance RunWith all the data pouring in to the iRunFar Western States Prediction Contest, we just couldn’t help but play with the data. Below we attempt to apply a hive-mentality approach to see how the men’s and women’s fields play out when the collective thoughts of 175 contest participants are accumulated. In addition to showing how many picks the top runners received for each place, we ranked the runners by MVP-style voting (i.e., 8 points for first, 7 points for second, and so on). Both the men’s and women’s tables show all WS runners who accumulated 20 or more points. Read on to see how the masses predicted the outcome for the big dance this weekend as well as some iRunFar analysis of those prediction and commentary on the race.

MontrailThanks again to all who participated in the contest! We hope you run away from it with a pair of Montrail Mountain Masochists and some Mountain Hardware apparel. Oh, and best of luck to all the runners the weekend. Follow us on Twitter or Facebook to receive updates on the men’s leaders and the top few women early in the day. Pacing duties will have Bryon occupied from Bath Road (mile 60.6) to the finish.

The Men’s Field
2009 Western States WS WSER 100 mens field predictions(click table to enlarge)

Interesting Men’s Field Notes

  • Scott Jurek received 1,242 of a maximum possible 1,400 points.
  • Jurek was the most frequent pick for both first and second place and he received all 167 of his votes to finish in the top 6, but 8 people did not pick him at all.
  • Only 6 different men were picked most frequently for one of the top 8 spots. Jurek (1+2) and AJW (7 +8) doubled up in the picking.
  • iRunFar readers picked Jurek (47), Mackey (46), and Koerner (45) with almost identical frequency to finish second.
  • Koerner edged out Mackey for second in MVP-style voting despite Mackey getting many more first place votes (33-15).
  • There were two very close point totals in the top 10. Skaden (466) nipped Grossman (455). More people picked Grossman to place in the Top 4, while more participants included Skaden among their picks. We’d concur – Grossman’s got higher potential and could nail one with Skaden being the safer bet.
  • 69 different men were picked to place among the top 8!
iRunFar Men’s Commentary
  • Krupicka (10th) and King (22nd) are not running
  • Tsuyoshi Kaburagi is the top foreign pick in 11th. Given that he’s only raced one American ultra that we know of off hand (The North Face Endurance Challenge ’08), we were impressed with his standing from the American-heavy contest participants. However, we also think this may mean he would have ranked even higher if he had more US exposure.
  • We think the ranking of the first nine men is fairly reasonable. Of those, Brian Morrison could make the biggest jump… and not just because he’s ranked 9th.
  • Of the other men on the list, those with the potential to move up the most spots are David James (relative newcomer with an impressive start 2009 and nothing to lose), Jez Bragg (fast Brit), Sean Meissner (ready to bust one out), Leigh Schmitt (nearly unbeatable in East Coast 50s and the VT100 course record holder), and Michael Wardian (if anyone can bounce back from placing 6th place at the 100k world champs last week, it’s Iron Mike).
  • Despite the heat, there’s a real chance that the men’s masters record (Twietmeyer – 17:17) goes down with Grossman, AJW, and Kaburagi in the race.
  • If Marco Olmo finishes, he should shatter the men’s 60 and over record.
The Women’s Field
2009 Western States WS WSER 100 womens field predictions(click table to enlarge)

Interesting Women’s Field Notes

  • Unsurprisingly, iRunFar readers overwhelmingly picked Nikki Kimball for the women’s won. What’s more, Kimball outscored Jurek (1,297 to 1,242). As two fewer folks cast votes for the women (175 to 173), Nikki had 8 fewer total possible points with 1,382.
  • As you can see from the table, iRunFar readers most frequently picked positions coincide almost exactly with the point totals. The only exception - 100-mile rookie Anita Ortiz.
  • Anita did not receive a single first place vote and was not the most frequent pick for any place and yet received the fifth most points.
  • Jenn accumulated nearly as many points as Bev. However, Jenn’s received many more first place picks (17 to 3), but was also more frequently picked for fifth through eighth. Bev received more votes than Jenn for second (28 to 19) and was the most frequently picked women to place third and fourth. Good thinking readers.
  • 61 different women were picked to place in the top 8.
iRunFar Women’s Commentary
  • Word is that Prudence L’Heureux (10th) won’t be running on Saturday.
  • Despite the apparent conclusiveness of the Kimball, Moehl, Anderson-Abs ranking – both Krissy and Bev are in top form.
  • Shelton is the fastest woman in the field. No doubts there. Money says she has a 20 minute lead crossing El Dorado Creek… and she doesn’t cross the river. No haters here – just saying it’s all or nothing with this young speedster.
  • We’ve got to admit that Caren Spore is the highest ranked runner in either field that we know absolutely nothing about! Apparently she runs on Vespa.
  • Three members of the WORLD CHAMPION American women’s 100k team will be running on Saturday. Meghan Arbogast and Connie Gardner will be racing the full distance while fast foodie Devon Crosby-Helms will be pacing Krissy Moehl for 20 miles late in the race. You go girls!
Master’s Picks
Contest participants chose an amazing 27 different men to win the masters race. That said, only four runners received more than 4 votes in this category: Andy Jones-Wilkins (79), Eric Grossman (27), Marco Olmo (12), and Dean Karnazes (8). Mark Lantz and Tsuyoshi Kaburagi tied for fifth with four votes apiece.

While AJW may have dominated the men’s masters picks, BAA (Bev Anderson-Abbs) ran circles around the other masters women. Bev received 109 picks while Anita Ortiz (16), Connie Gardner (12), and Meghan Arbogast (5) rounded out the top 4. In total 21 different masters women were picked for the win.

Commentary On Contest Participation
  • Three individuals picked themselves for an overall win. At least two of them will be taking on points for their picks.
  • At least one WSER trustee participated in the contest.
  • One man ranked in the top 9 by iRunFar readers did not pick himself to place in the top 8.
  • At least four men who won a 100 miler in North America in 2008 participated in the contest. If you can’t beat them on the course, maybe you can beat them in the contest.
  • Sean Meissner was the only WS synchroblogger not to participate in the prediction contest. We will pester him until he makes unofficial picks. Rest assured there will be major bragging rights to he amongst us who knows the Western States field better than the rest.
Questions
  • So what do you all think about the group prediction?
  • Would any of you change your picks if you could due to the increase in forecast high? (101F in Auburn)
  • Want to make any of your predictions public? If so, leave a comment!

Read more of Western States Group-Think Predictions!

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

This Week In Running : Special Western States 100 Edition

Western States Endurance RunIt has been two long years since Hal Koerner crossed the finish line in first place at the 2007 Western States Endurance Run with a time of 16:12:16. Two long years since Nikki Kimball won her 3rd WSER in 18:12:37. It has been too long.

The 2008 edition of the WSER just didn't happen. Race officials were forced to cancel the event due to wildfires caused by dry lightning strikes - more than 840 wildfires devastated the State of California, with 312 fires in northern California. Over 3,200 lightning strikes hit in the Tahoe National Forest alone on a single day. A rapid deterioration of the air quality around the finish of the race in Auburn, California, a shroud of smoke that limited visibility and the air quality at the start of the race in Squaw Valley, California, and two wildfires burning in close proximity to the race course; one of which was burning within two miles of one of the race's critical access roads for aid station and race volunteers, created conditions that were simply too dangerous for runners, turning away a field that included Andy Jones-Wilkins, Anton Krupicka, Beverley Anderson-Abbs, Brian Morrison, Caren Spore, Graham Cooper, Hal Koerner, Karl Meltzer, Mark Godale, Michael Wardian, Nikki Kimball and Kami Semick.

Fast forward to Saturday, June 27, 2009.....it's back ! 18,000+ feet of climbing. 21,000+ feet of descent. A stellar, star-studded cast of characters ready to take their place at the starting line at the base of the Squaw Valley ski resort, with hopes of being the first to cross the finish line at the Placer High School track in Auburn, California.

The WSER is rich in history (a complete history of the Western States Trail, the Trail Ride, and the run, head on over to the History section of the WSER web-site). In 1955, Wendell T. Robie and five horsemen rode the Western States Trail from Squaw Valley to Auburn, proving that horses could cover 100 miles in a single day. Robie later founded the Western States Trail Foundation and organized the annual Western States Trail Ride (a/k/a the Tevis Cup). In 1974, Tevis Cup veteran Gordy Ainsleigh decided to join the horses participating in the Western States Trail Ride to see if he could complete the course on foot, and arrived in Auburn 23:42 after the start. The following year Ron Kelley attempted the 100 miles on foot, but dropped two miles of the finish.

The first official WSER took place in 1977 and included 14 runners, only 3 of which (Andy Gonzales in 22:57, and Peter Mattei and Ralph Paffenbarger, both in 28:36) finished the race. It was the 1977 event that gave birth to the 30-hour time award. The Board of Directors for the Western States Endurance Run was formed as part of the Western States Trail Foundation in the fall of 1977. An increase in interest and participation in the WSER quickly followed. Soon, the race grew to include 21 aid stations and 6 medical checks. 63 runner participated in 1978, including the first woman, Pat Smythe, who finished in 29:34. 143 runners participated in 1979, and the event has since reached its full entrance quota.

From 1999 to 2005 the men's event was dominated by Scott Jurek, including his course record 15:36:27 in 2004. Graham Cooper took the men's title in 2006, and Hal Koerner in 2007 (he returns this year as the defending champion). On the women's side, the great Ann Trason was virtually unstoppable from 1989 to 2003, winning 10 straight and 14 out of 15 (her only non-win occurring in 1999), and setting the women's course record of 17:37:51 in 1994. Since 2003, the women's event has been won 3 times by Nikki Kimball (2004, 2006 and 2007) and once by Annette Bednosky (2005).

And then there was, of course, the unfortunate 2006 incident involving Graham Cooper (18:17:28) and Brian Morrison (DQ). Coached by Jurek, Morrison would collapse a few times during the final 300 meters on the Placer High School track. Aided by Jurek and another pacer, and despite being comfortably (a few minutes) ahead of Cooper, Morrison was later disqualified for receiving aid during the run from his pacers, and for failing to complete the distance under his own power. Cooper was declared the winner.

There is tremendous excitement surrounding this year's running of WSER, not just due to its two year hiatus, but more so as a result of perhaps the deepest starting field in the history of the event. What a sick field it is. Let's name names.....On the men's side of the coin, there's Anton Krupicka (out), Dave Mackey, Erik Skaden, Jon Olsen (maybe out), Jorge Pacheco, Dave James, Max King (out), Jasper Halekas, Gary Robbins, Eric Grossman, Hal Koerner, Graham Cooper, Erik Skaden, Scott Wolfe, Mike Wolfe, Dan Olmstead, and many more. Oh, and of course, there is the return of the man who has owned this course, Scott Jurek. On the women's side of the coin, we have, among others, two-time defending champion Nikki Kimball, Krissy Moehl, Bev Anderson-Abbs, Jenny Capel, Connie Gardner, and Jenn Shelton. You think you know who is going to win this year (because we sure don't), test your prediction skills in iRunFar.com's Western States Prediction Contest. [Trail Goat Note: The WS prediction contest - and your chance to win Montrail shoes and Mountain Hardwear clothes - ends at 5 p.m. EDT on Thursday, June 25, so get your entry in quick!]

If you're looking for more iRunFar insight into the Western States 100, check out our previous posts on the subject.

Read more of This Week In Running : Special Western States 100 Edition!